The sudden death of a student at IIT Bombay after a mid-semester examination has created quite an uproar regarding pressure, welfare of students, examination ethics, and responsibility of education institutes.
Sahil Wakode, a second year B.Tech student from the Department of Energy Science and Engineering of IIT Bombay, committed suicide on September 18, 2026 after a mid-semester examination incident. As per IIT Bombay officials, Wakode was found using his mobile phone during the mid-semester examination and had uploaded the entire question paper on ChatGPT in order to get answers. As per the video footage available from the CCTV camera in the examination hall, it was found that he was using a mobile phone.
The whole process of what happened took place very quickly. As per reports, Prof Suryanarayana Doolla caught Wakode using a phone and took him out of the examination hall. The institute officials further reported that the student had been counseled and promised that his academic future will not be affected due to this incident and no disciplinary action is to be taken against him.
However, Wakode was found dead few hours later in his hostel room.
Given the sequence of events, there have been natural speculations about what transpired between the examination hall and the hostel. Mumbai Police Crime Branch is currently investigating CCTV footage, digital evidence, and testimonies of students and faculty members regarding the last few hours before the tragedy. The interaction that followed the removal of Wakode from the examination hall is also being looked into.
Meanwhile, it is equally essential that we not come to conclusions based on assumptions. Wakode's family claims that Wakode suffered caste discrimination and harassment, and his father filed a First Information Report against Professor Doolla on the grounds of abetment to suicide and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. These are still allegations which require further investigation and cannot be treated as conclusive findings yet. IIT Bombay claims that there was no complaint made by Wakode against the institute for caste discrimination.
The entire incident has also caused major unrest within the campus itself. More than 400 students have taken part in protests against the institute's handling of the matter and have demanded stronger mechanisms to take care of the mental well-being of students.
This case also demonstrates one of the hardest aspects of academic integrity – the use of AI in examinations. Although the ChatGPT service may help students in studying and conducting research, using such technology during the examination, where it was forbidden, becomes an examination integrity issue. Thus, institutions need to ensure that their rules and procedures are clearly communicated and also proportionate.
Undoubtedly, the main point of the case is that academic misconduct and student wellbeing cannot be two completely different aspects. Rules about cheating are needed to maintain equality and academic integrity. However, at the same time, a violation in academics should be followed by the right process, rather than making the student believe that his/her life has ended.
In the case of the death of Wakode, it is necessary for the inquiry to reveal what really transpired. However, irrespective of whatever conclusion the inquiry reaches, the tragedy raises the pressing question for the country’s leading institutes of learning as to how to protect academic standards while making sure that students who err seriously have a way forward.
An exam can be re-taken; a punishment can be reviewed; a career can take an unpredictable course. But a life lost can never be reclaimed.
Team Yuva Aaveg-
Adarsh Tiwari
🌟 Join Yuva Aaveg! 🌟
A vibrant community dedicated to empowering youth with the latest insights, discussions, and updates on topics that matter. Connect with like-minded individuals, share ideas, and stay inspired to make a difference.
📲 Join us on WhatsApp and Telegram for exclusive updates and engaging conversations!









